Why does a person sitting in a stationary
vehicle get pulled back when the vehicle starts moving?
In order
to understand this phenomenon you perform an experiment. Cover the mouth of a
glass tumbler with a piece of cardboard and place a coin on it. Now push the
cardboard with your finger so that the cardboard is thrown off the tumbler. Do
you know what would happen? Along with the cardboard the coin would also fall
off the glass. You should not worry and once again place the cardboard atop the
glass along with a coin. Now flick the cardboard forcefully with your
forefinger propelled with the help of your thumb and observe the consequences.
This time it would be quite different from
what happened earlier. As soon as you strike the cardboard it would be thrown
off but the coin would drop in the glass tumbler. What actually happens is
this; the cardboard is thrown off with such a force that the coin fails to
accompany the cardboard and the cause of the failure of the coin to move
together with the cardboard is law of inertia. When a thing is stationary it
remains in that stage till an external force makes it move. This is called Law
of inertia.
Inertia and Mass
Newton's first
law of motion states that "An object at rest stays at rest and an object
in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless
acted upon by an unbalanced force." Objects tend to "keep on doing
what they're doing." In fact, it is the natural tendency of objects to
resist changes in their state of motion. This tendency to resist changes in
their state of motion is described as inertia.
Inertia: the resistance an object has
to a change in its state of motion.
Newton's conception of inertia
stood in direct opposition to more popular conceptions about motion. The
dominant thought prior to Newton's day was that it was the natural tendency of
objects to come to a rest position. Moving objects, so it was believed, would eventually
stop moving; a force was necessary to keep an object moving. But if left to
itself, a moving object would eventually come to rest and an object at rest
would stay at rest; thus, the idea that dominated people's thinking for nearly
2000 years prior to Newton was that it was the natural tendency of all objects
to assume a rest position.
All objects resist changes in
their state of motion. All objects have this tendency - they have inertia. But
do some objects have more of a tendency to resist changes than others?
Absolutely yes! The tendency of an object to resist changes in its state of
motion varies with mass. Mass is that quantity that is solely dependent upon
the inertia of an object. The more inertia that an object has, the more mass it
has. A more massive object has a greater tendency to resist changes in its
state of motion.
Suppose that there are two seemingly identical bricks at rest on
the physics lecture table. Yet one brick consists of mortar and the other brick
consists of Styrofoam. Without lifting the bricks, how could you tell which
brick was the Styrofoam
brick? You could give the bricks an identical push in an effort to
change their state of motion. The brick that offers the least resistance is the
brick with the least inertia - and therefore the brick with the least mass (i.e.,
the Styrofoam
brick).
A common physics demonstration relies on this principle that the
more massive the objects, the more that object resist changes in its state of
motion. The demonstration goes as follows: several massive books are placed
upon a teacher's head. A wooden board is placed on top of the books and a
hammer is used to drive a nail into the board. Due to the large mass of the
books, the force of the hammer is sufficiently resisted (inertia). This is
demonstrated by the fact that the teacher does not feel the hammer blow.
BY
KISHORE,
NSS VOLUNTEER
0 comments:
Post a Comment